Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 991-997, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-942999

ABSTRACT

Objective: Severe radiation-induced late rectal injury (sRLRI) directly affects the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer. Effective prediction of sRLRI before surgery may provide important information for the selection of surgical strategies and perioperative managements. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of predicting sRLRI based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features before and after radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Methods: This was a diagnostic study. Clinical and imaging data of 90 patients with rectal cancer receiving long-term radiotherapy from June 2013 to July 2018 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected retrospectively. Case inclusion criteria: (1) rectal cancer was diagnosed by pathology and age of ≥ 18 years old; (2) patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and anterior rectal resection; (3) follow up time ≥ 3 years; (4) patients had no history of other neoplasm. Exclusion criteria: (1) patients did not receive MRI examination in our hospital within 2 weeks before and/or 8 weeks after radiotherapy; (2) images were not good enough for evaluation; (3) medical records were incomplete; (4) patients had severe gastrointestinal diseases. According to the RTOG/EORTC classification criteria for radiation reactions, severe complications of grade 3-4 requiring surgical management were defined as sRLRI. T2WI and DWI images before and after radiotherapy were evaluated. The rectal wall thickness, bladder wall thickness, rectal sacral spacing and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of the above indicators for sRLRI. Results: Among the 90 patients with rectal cancer, 34 (37.8%) developed sRLRI. Before radiotherapy, the median rectal wall thickness of sRLRI and non-sRLRI patients was 4.530 mm and 4.355 mm, respectively; the median bladder wall thickness was 3.962 mm and 3.868 mm, respectively; the median rectal sacral spacing was 15.557 mm and 12.433 mm, respectively; the median ADC value of rectal wall was 1.620 ×10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.653 ×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. There were no significant differences in above indicators between sRLRI and non-sRLRI patients (all P>0.05). After radiotherapy, compared with non-sRLRI patients, sRLRI patients had increased rectal wall thickness (median: 8.239 mm vs. 6.223 mm, Z=-3.512, P=0.001), rectal sacral spacing (median: 17.728 mm vs. 13.885 mm, Z=-2.247, P=0.025), and change of rectal wall thickness after radiotherapy (median: 98.106% vs. 49.584%, Z=-4.169, P<0.001). After radiotherapy, there were no significant differences in the bladder wall thickness and its change value, the ADC value of rectal wall and its change rate before and after radiotherapy between the two groups (all P>0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the change rates of rectal wall thickness after radiotherapy, rectal wall thickness and rectal sacral spacing after radiotherapy for predicting sRLRI was 0.763, 0.722 and 0.642, respectively, while the sensitivity was 85.3%, 70.6% and 76.5%, respectively, and the specificity was 64.3%, 71.4% and 57.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Based on MRI examinations, assessments of rectal wall thickness after radiotherapy, the change rate of rectal wall thickness after radiotherapy, and rectal sacral spacing after radiotherapy are helpful for evaluating the risk of sRLRI after radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Humans , Chemoradiotherapy , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Quality of Life , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 72(6): 559-566, dic. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388767

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: El tratamiento estándar del cáncer del recto localmente avanzado (CRLA) actual es multimodal. La cirugía mínimamente invasiva es factible en el manejo de este tumor, aunque existe controversia sobre sus resultados alejados. Objetivo: Comparar los resultados inmediatos y alejados de una serie laparoscópica (CL) con una serie de cirugía convencional (CA) intervenidos por CRLA. Materiales y Método: Revisión retrospectiva de ambas técnicas de abordaje en un periodo de 14 años. Se analiza la morbilidad, los resultados patológicos, la recidiva local y la sobrevida a largo plazo. Para estimar las curvas de sobrevida se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier. Para comparar las curvas de sobrevida se usó el test de log-rank. Resultados: Se compara 163 pacientes intervenidos por CL con 164 operados mediante CA. Ambos grupos resultaron equivalentes en cuanto a las variables demográficas, morbilidad perioperatoria y estadios patológicos finales, salvo un menor tiempo de hospitalización en el grupo CL (p = 0,007). Los tumores bajos recibieron radioterapia preoperatoria en el 90% de los casos. La recidiva local global y la sobrevida a largo plazo no muestran diferencias de acuerdo al tipo de abordaje. Al excluir los pacientes con una lesión en el recto superior se aprecia que los tumores de recto bajo tienen peor pronóstico, independiente de la técnica empleada (p = 0,007). Conclusiones: La CL es equivalente a la CA en el manejo multimodal del CRLA. La inclusión de tumores del recto superior tiende a mejorar artificialmente los resultados de la cirugía en cuanto a recidiva local y sobrevida global.


Introduction: Total mesorectal excison and preoperative radiotherapy are important components of multimodal treatment in patients with a low locally advanced rectal cancer. Short-term results of laparoscopic surgery has proven to be safe but oncological results are unclear. Aim: To compare short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of locally advanced rectal cancer operated on in the same period. Materials and Method: A total of 327 patientes with rectal cancer treated by open and laparoscopic curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term follow up was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and survival data were tested by log rank test. Results: Demographic data, levels of carcinoembryonaric antigen, perioperative morbidity and pathologic stages were similar in both groups, except for less inhospital time in laparoscopic group (p = 0.007). Over 90% of middle and low tumors recived preoperative radiotherapy. Local recurrence and overall survival shows no difference between both groups. Low and middle rectal cancer showed worst prognosis than tumors of the high rectum, no matter of type of surgery (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to open resection for pathological and oncological outcomes. It's not convenient to include on trials lesions located in the high rectum, usually treated with primary surgery as colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 39(2): 127-131, Apr.-June 2019. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012584

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the partial results of a study in patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy regarding the rate of complete clinical response, disease-free survival, anorectal function, and quality of life. Material and methods: This was a prospective study from June 2015 to June 2018, in patients with low- or mid-rectum adenocarcinoma and clinical stage II or III, treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (IMRT 54 Gy for six weeks) concomitant with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 380 mg/m2 and folinic acid (LV) 20 mg/m2 for five days in the first and fifth weeks and two cycles after radiotherapy (5-FU 400 mg/m2 and LV 20 mg/m2) every 28 days. After the treatment, clinical examination, rectosigmoidoscopy, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, chest and upper abdomen computed tomography, and CEA testing were performed. Resection surgery was performed in those with incomplete clinical response (iCR). Those with complete clinical response (cCR) are under observation (wait-and-see policy). Manometry and scintigraphic function and quality of life scales were collected before treatment and at 30 and 90 days after the end of treatment. Results: As of June 2018, 11 patients were recruited. One was excluded from the analysis for presenting severe toxicity, suggestive of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, after the first chemotherapy cycle. All others completed the treatment. Two patients presented toxicity grade 3/4 related to chemotherapy and had their doses reduced. Seven patients (70%) presented iRC; three underwent rectosigmoidectomy, and the anatomopathological evaluation indicated complete pathological response in two cases (28.5%). Three (30%) presented cCR and did not present evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 19 months. Patients presented improvement of anorectal function and quality of life. Conclusions: Advances in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal tumors contributed to better rates of complete pathological responses. New paradigms promote an increase in the complete clinical response rates, which would allow organ preservation and consequent reduction of surgical morbidity.


RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever os resultados parciais de estudo em pacientes com câncer de reto submetidos a tratamento neoadjuvante com quimioterapia e radioterapia quanto à taxa resposta clínica completa, sobrevida livre de doença, função anorretal e qualidade de vida. Material e métodos: Estudo prospectivo desde junho 2015 até junho de 2018, em paciente com adenocarcinoma de reto baixo ou médio e estadio clínico II ou III tratados com RT/QT (IMRT 54 Gy em 6 semanas) concomitante a 5-Fuorouracil (5-FU) 380 mg/m2 e ácido folínico (LV) 20 mg/m2 por 5 dias nas primeira e quinta semanas e dois ciclos após RT (5-FU 400 mg/m2 e LV 20 mg/m2) a cada 28 dias. Após o tratamento, realizou-se exame clínico, retossigmoidoscopia, RNM de pelve, TC de tórax e abdômen superior e dosagem de CEA. Naqueles com Resposta Clínica Incompleta (iRC) procedeu-se à cirurgia de ressecção. Aqueles com Resposta Completa (cRC) estão em observação (wait and see policy). Manometria e escalas de função esfincteriana e qualidade de vida foram obtidas antes e após 30 e 90 dias do término do tratamento. Resultados: Até junho de 2018, recrutaram-se 11 pacientes. Um foi excluído da análise, pois apresentou toxicidade severa sugestiva de deficiência de DPD após o primeiro ciclo de QT. Todos os demais concluíram o tratamento. Toxicidades graus 3/4 relacionadas à QT ocorreram dois pacientes, reduzindo-se sua dose. Sete (70%) apresentaram iRC, submetendo três à retossigmoidectomia cuja avaliação anatomopatológica evidenciou Resposta Completa (pRC) em dois casos (28,5%). Três (30%) apresentaram cRC e estão sem evidência de doença com seguimento médio de 19 meses. Houve melhora da função anorretal e da qualidade de vida. Conclusões: Avanços no tratamento neoadjuvante dos tumores de reto contribuíram para melhores taxas de pRC. Novos paradigmas promovem crescentes índices de cRC, o que possibilitaria a preservação do órgão e consequente redução da morbidade cirúrgica.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Quality of Life , Rectum/surgery
4.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 29(1): 1-6, Sept. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1015082

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Se diagnostican hasta 13000 nuevos casos de cáncer colorrectal por año, y esto va en aumento. El cáncer de recto debe ser tratado mediante un abordaje multimodal. Luego de la implementación del tratamiento neoadyuvante y de la aparición de la respuesta patológica completa se implementó el manejo no operatorio. Nuestro objetivo es describir nuestra experiencia con el manejo inicial no operatorio de pacientes con cáncer de recto, que recibieron neoadyuvancia y desarrollaron una respuesta clínica completa inicial. Diseño: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo. Pacientes y Métodos: 49 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de recto bajo (< 8 cm), recibieron tratamiento neoadyuvante con radioquimioterapia (RQT). Se realizó radioterapia (RT), a una dosis de 5040 cGy por un total de 5 semanas, y concomitante a esta, quimioterapia (QT) con 5-Fu-leucovorina en las semanas 1 y 5. Aquellos pacientes en los cuales se encontró cCR inicial a la neoadyuvancia, y la cirugía resectiva implicaba alto riesgo quirúrgico debido a sus comorbilidades y/o imposibilidad de la conservación de esfínteres se planteó la posibilidad de tomar una conducta no operatoria. Resultados: Se incluyeron 8 pacientes con cCR. El promedio de edad de los pacientes fue de 70 años (mediana 69,5 años), el promedio de altura del tumor fue de 5,8 cm; todos en estadio IIa. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 72,5 meses. 3 pacientes presentaron recaídas, todas endoluminales, 2 fueron tempranas (9 y 12 meses) y una tardía (18 meses), los cuales fueron operados, 2 de ellos se encuentran actualmente libres de enfermedad y el tercero óbito a los 30 días POP. La sobrevida global de los pacientes fue de un 87,5% y se evitó una cirugía mayor en 5 pacientes (62,5%). Conclusión: La implementación del tratamiento inicial no operatorio del cáncer de recto en aquellos pacientes que desarrollaron cCR luego del tratamiento neoadyuvante puede ser seguro, siempre y cuando estos pacientes estén incluidos en un programa de seguimiento estricto que permita una cirugía de rescate. El tratamiento conservador sin cirugía debe ser reservado para pacientes de alto riesgo quirúrgico o en los que la cirugía implique la necesidad de una cirugía de amputación abdominoperineal. (AU)


Introduction: 13000 new cases of colorectal cases are diagnosed per year. Rectal cancer must be treated with a multimodal approach. After the administration of neoadjuvant treatment and the appearance of a pathologic complete response, nonoperative management was implemented. Our objective is to describe our experience with nonoperative management of patients with rectal cancer that received neoadjuvant therapy and developed an initial complete clinical response. Design: Retrospective descriptive observational study. Patients and Methods: Forty-nine patients with low rectal cancer (< 8 cm) received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed with a total dose of 5040 cGy for 5 weeks, and concomitant 5-FU-leucovorin-based chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 5. Nonoperative management was attempted on patients experiencing initial cCR to neoadjuvant therapy and with a higher surgical risk due to their comorbidity and/or impossibility of conserving the sphincters. Results: Eight patients with cCR were included. The average age of the patients was 70 years; the average height of the tumor was 5.8 cm; all of them at stage IIA. Median follow-up was 72.5 months. Two patients developed an early endoluminal recurrence (after 9 and 12 months) and one had a late recurrence (18 months). All of them had surgery. Two of them are disease-free and one died 30 days after surgery. Conclusion: Implementation of initial nonoperative treatment of rectal cancer in patients that developed cCR after neoadjuvant therapy can be safe, provided that those patients are included in a strict monitoring programme that would allow for a rescue surgery. Conservative treatment without surgery must be reserved for patients with a higher surgical risk or who require an abdominoperineal resection. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Watchful Waiting , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Conservative Treatment , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
5.
Oncol. clín ; 23(1): 9-14, 2018. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-909794

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar ventajas potenciales de la radioterapia de intensidad modulada (IMRT) vs. la radioterapia 3D (3DRT) en el control loco-regional y la toxicidad aguda en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (CRLA). Se analizaron retrospectivamente 235 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto T2/T4 y N0/N1 sometidos a radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante entre febrero de 2010 y agosto de 2015. La modalidad radiante se correlacionó con los resultados clínicos (control local y a distancia) y las tasas de toxicidades agudas urinarias, hematológicas, gastrointestinales (GI) y dérmicas. Ciento cuarenta (59.6%) recibieron IMRT y 95 (40.4%) 3DRT. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 36 meses. Las tasas de recidiva local y metástasis a distancia fueron similares entre IMRT y 3DRT. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en control local (CL) ni en supervivencia global (SG) entre IMRT y 3DRT (p=0.56 y p=0.24, respectivamente), ni en colostomía libre para tumores rectales bajos (p=0.44). IMRT implicó menor toxicidad cutánea (p<0.001), hematológica (p<0.0001), urinaria (p=0.0017), y gastrointestinal (p=0.0006). La incidencia de diarrea grado ≥ 3 fue del 16% entre los pacientes del grupo 3DRT frente al 5% de del grupo IMRT. En el análisis univariado, el estadio clínico T, edad, KPS, y quimioterapia adyuvante se asociaron con mejor SG (todos p<0.05) y la dosis total de radiación se asoció con mejor período libre de enfermedad (p=0.0065) Postulamos que IMRT permitiría un aumento de dosis en forma segura con el potencial de aumentar la tasa de respuestas patológicas completas (RPC), en particular en tumores rectales bajos (AU)


The aim was to compare the advantages of IMRT vs. 3D in loco regional control and acute toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectum cancer. We analyzed retrospectively 235 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T2/T4 and N0/N1 undergoing chemo radiation between February 2010 and August 2015. The radiant modality was correlated with clinical outcomes (local and systemic control) and rates of acute urinary, hematological, gastrointestinal and dermal toxicities. One hundred and forty patients (59.6%) received IMRT and 95 (40.4%) received 3D. The median follow-up time was 36 months. The rates of local recurrence and distant metastases were similar between IMRT vs. 3D. No statistically significant differences were found in local control or survival between IMRT and 3D (p=0.56 and p =0.24, respectively), nor in free colostomy for low rectal tumors (p= 0.44). IMRT resulted in lower dermal (p<0.001), hematological (p<0.0001), urinary (p=0.0017), and gastrointestinal toxicity (p=0.0006). The incidence of diarrhea grade ≥ 3 was 16% among 3D patients vs. 5% in IMRT. In the univariate analysis, clinical stage T, age, KPS, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better overall survival (all p<0.05) and the total dose of radiation was associated with better disease-free period (p=0.0065). We postulate that IMRT would allow us to increase dose in a safe manner with the potential to increase rate of complete pathological responses, particularly in low rectal tumors (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy
6.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 28(2): 140-145, Dic. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1008569

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La importancia del tratamiento neoadyuvante con quimio y radioterapia en el manejo de los tumores de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado ha quedado claramente demostrada. La droga que ha sido históricamente más utilizada para este fin fue el 5-Fluorouracilo (5-FU). Una nueva molécula de administración por vía oral, la prodroga capecitabine, ha reemplazado al 5-FU en el tratamiento neoadyuvante en los últimos tiempos, con mejores resultados y mayor comodidad. Objetivo: Valorar la eficacia, toxicidad y complicaciones del tratamiento neoadyuvante con capecitabine más radioterapia en el tratamiento del cáncer de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado. Diseño: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo. Población y Métodos: Se incluyeron 33 pacientes (66% de sexo masculino) con tumores de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado (cT3/cT4 o cN+) con indicación de neoadyuvancia. La dosis de radioterapia fue de 45 Gy más un boost de 5,04 Gy administradas en 25 sesiones durante un período de 5 semanas. La dosis de capecitabine fue de 850 mg/m2, dos veces al día durante los días en que se administraba la radioterapia. Se reevaluó a los pacientes entre la 8º y 10º semana. Aquellos pacientes con respuesta clínica completa (RCC) se les ofreció ingresar al protocolo de Watch & Wait, mientras que aquellos pacientes con respuesta clínica incompleta o nula se les indicó la resección quirúrgica entre las 10-12 semanas posttratamiento neoadyuvante. Resultados: 10 pacientes (30,3%) tuvieron respuesta clínica completa (RCC). De estos, 7 entraron a protocolo Watch & Wait. Se operaron 26 pacientes, luego de un promedio de 11,71 semanas posteriores a la neoadyuvancia, siguiendo en todos los casos la técnica de excisión total del mesorrecto. Se observó un 19,3% de RPC y un downstaging del 57,69%. A dieciséis pacientes (61,53%) se les efectuó una resección anterior ultrabaja con ostomía de protección. Nueve pacientes fueron sometidos a una amputación abdominoperineal (34,61%) y una paciente recibió una operación de Hartmann (3,84%). El principal efecto adverso fue la diarrea grado I en el 36% de los casos, seguida por la dermatitis grado I en el 33%. Tuvimos dos dehiscencias anastomóticas que se resolvieron sin reintervención. Conclusiones: El tratamiento neoadyuvante con capecitabine es una opción segura, con alta tasa de respuesta clínica y patológica completa, con escasa toxicidad y complicaciones, y el beneficio de la comodidad de su administración por vía oral. (AU)


Background: The importance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of extraperitoneal rectal tumors locally advanced has been clearly demonstrated. The drug has been historically used for this purpose was 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). A new molecule oral administration, the prodrug capecitabine, has replaced the 5-FU in the neoadjuvant treatment in recent times, with better results and greater comfort. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and complications of neoadjuvant capecitabine plus radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer extraperitoneal. Design: Observational, descriptive, retrospective study. Population and Methods: 33 patients (66% male) with extraperitoneal rectal tumors locally advanced (cT3 / cT4 or cN +) with indication of neoadjuvant were included. Radiation dose was 45 Gy plus a boost of 5.04 Gy administered in 25 sessions over a period of 5 weeks. Capecitabine dose was 850 mg / m2 twice daily on days that radiotherapy was administered. It was reevaluated patients between the 8th and 10th week. Patients with clinical complete response (CCR) were offered to enter the protocol Watch & Wait, while patients with incomplete or no clinical response were instructed surgical resection neoadjuvant between 10-12 weeks post-treatment. Results: 10 patients (30.3%) had clinical complete response (CCR). Of these, seven entered Watch & Wait protocol. 26 patients were operated after a mean time of 11,71 weeks (range 10-15), in all cases following the total mesorectal excision technique. 19.3% of RPC and downstaging of 57.69% was observed. Sixteen patients (61.53%) were made ultra-low anterior resection with protective stoma. Nine patients underwent an AP amputation (34.61%) and one patient received a Hartmann operation(3.84%). The main side effect was diarrhea grade I in 36% of cases, followed by the degree I dermatitis in 33%. We had two anastomotic dehiscences which resolved without reoperation. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant capecitabine therapy is a safe choice, with high rate of complete clinical and pathological response with low toxicity and complications, and the benefit from the comfort of oral administration. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Radiotherapy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Watchful Waiting
7.
Rev. chil. cir ; 69(2): 181-183, abr. 2017.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-844353

ABSTRACT

El cáncer de recto es una enfermedad frecuente en la población, siendo un problema de salud importante a nivel nacional, con un probable aumento en la incidencia junto con la transición demográfica y epidemiológica de los últimos años. La cirugía ha sido históricamente el pilar fundamental en el tratamiento de esta patología, pero asociándose a una alta tasa de recurrencia, tanto locorregional como a distancia, como único tratamiento. Es por esto que se ha estudiado el agregar terapias adyuvantes a la cirugía, como lo es la radioterapia y quimioterapia. La evidencia ha demostrado que la adyuvancia con radioterapia más quimioterapia se asocia a mayor sobrevida global y menor recurrencia local y a distancia en comparación con la cirugía exclusiva. En el presente artículo se realiza una revisión de los principales estudios que evidencian la ventaja, tanto en sobrevida global como libre de enfermedad, del uso de la adyuvancia con radioterapia más quimioterapia, mencionando la última evidencia disponible sobre el tratamiento del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y las perspectivas a futuro.


Rectal cancer is a common disease in general population, being a major health problem in our nation, with a likely increase in incidence associated to demographic and epidemiological transition in recent years. Historically, the surgery has been the mainstay in the treatment of this disease, but surgery alone is associated to a high rate of recurrence, both locoregional and distant. This is why it has been studied adding adjuvant therapies to surgery, as is radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The evidence has shown that adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is associated with increased overall survival and less local and distant recurrence compared to surgery alone. This article is a review of major studies that demonstrate the advantage of using adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in both overall and disease-free survival, mentioning the last evidence available in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Humans , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
8.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 36(1): 4-7, Jan.-Mar. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-780058

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The mortality rate in low rectal cancer is related to pelvic and distant recurrence. For stage I tumors, local excision has being used increasingly, but recent studies show the need for caution with the use of this technique, as they do not consider the possibility of a positive node in stage I rectal tumors. Therefore, preoperative radiotherapy should be considered for early tumors, as an attempt to prevent recurrence. Objetive: Show the effectiveness of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in stage I cancer of the lower rectum of a cohort population. Material and method: A cohort study in a prospective database was made with a total of 538 patients, of which were considered 75 patients with stage I lower rectal cancer. Preoperative radiotherapy was performed and patients were followed up for a minimum period of five years. Results: Stage I/TI group had 27 patients. All of them presented complete response to the treatment and did not need to be operated. During the follow up time of five years, this group showed no recurrence rate. The stage I/TII group had 48 patients. During the follow up, 8 patients had to be operated due to suspicious lesion or scar. They were submitted to full total local excision. After evaluating the pathological specimen, none of them proved to be adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Preoperative radiation, not only reduced the local recurrence and mortality rate in lower rectal cancer, but also reduced the need for surgery in patients with stage I cancer.


Introdução: O percentual de mortalidade em pacientes com câncer de reto baixo está relacionado a recorrências pélvica e remota. No caso de tumores no estágio I, a excisão local vem sendo utilizada cada vez mais; contudo, estudos recentemente publicados demonstraram a necessidade de se ter cautela com o uso dessa técnica, por não se levar em consideração a possibilidade de um nodo positivo em tumores de reto no estágio I. Portanto, a radioterapia pré-operatória é uma opção viável para os tumores em fase inicial, como uma tentativa de evitar recorrência. Objetivo: Demonstrar a eficácia da radioterapia neoadjuvante em casos de câncer de reto baixo no estágio I em uma coorte da população. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte em um banco de dados prospectivo, com envolvimento, no total, de 538 pacientes, dos quais 75 foram considerados como tendo câncer de reto baixo no estágio I. No pré-operatório, os pacientes foram tratados com radioterapia e seguidos durante um período mínimo de 5 anos. Resultados: O Grupo no estágio I/TI consistia em 27 pacientes. Todos obtiveram resposta completa ao tratamento e não houve necessidade de reoperação. Durante o período de 5 anos de seguimento, não houve recorrências nesse grupo. O grupo no estágio I/TII consistia em 48 pacientes. Durante o seguimento, 8 pacientes tiveram que ser operados, devido à suspeita de lesão, ou cicatriz. Para esses casos, optou-se por excisão local total completa. Após a avaliação dos espécimes patológicos, nenhum deles teve diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma. Conclusão: O uso da radiação pré-operatória não só diminuiu a recorrência local e o percentual de mortalidade em casos de câncer de reto baixo, mas também diminuiu a necessidade de cirurgia em pacientes com câncer no estágio I.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 584-587, May-June 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-755879

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTIntroduction:

The treatment of pelvic malignancies with radiotherapy can develop severe sequelae, especially radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. It is a progressive disease that can lead to the need for blood transfusion, hospitalizations, and surgical interventions. This tends to affect the quality of life of these patients, and management can at times be difficult. We have evaluated the GreenLight Xcelerated Performance System (XPS) with TruCoag, although primarily used for management of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), for the treatment of radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis.

Materials and Methods:

After International Review Board (IRB) approval, a retrospective chart review was performed in addition to a literature search. A series of four male patients, mean age of 81 years, with radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis secondary to radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies (3 prostate cancer, 1 rectal cancer) were successfully treated with the GreenLight laser after unsuccessful treatment with current therapies described in the literature.

Results:

All four patients treated with the GreenLight laser had resolution of their hematuria after one treatment and were discharge from the hospital with clear urine.

Conclusion:

The GreenLight XPS laser shows promising results for the treatment of patients with radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis, and deserves further evaluation and validation, especially since there is limited data available in the literature regarding the use of this technology for the treatment of this devastating condition.

.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Cystitis/surgery , Hemorrhage/surgery , Laser Coagulation/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Radiation Injuries/surgery , Cystitis/etiology , Hematuria/surgery , Hemorrhage/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 67(5): 803-809, Sep-Oct/2014. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: lil-731222

ABSTRACT

A vivência do climatério está cada vez mais presente, e demanda estratégias que melhorem a qualidade de vida das mulheres nesse período. A pesquisa objetivou avaliar a qualidade de vida de mulheres na fase do climatério, com ou sem uso da terapia de reposição hormonal (TRH). Estudo epidemiológico longitudinal, com amostra de 99 mulheres para cada grupo. Avaliaram-se as características sociodemográficas, clínicas e comportamentais. Foram aplicados à amostra a Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) e o Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Utilizaram-se os testes t de student, Qui-quadrado e Tukey. As usuárias de TRH apresentaram média etária de 50,76 ± 3,63 anos, e as não usuárias de 48,95 ± 6,27anos (p=0,01). Relataram maior frequência de sintomas climatéricos de intensidade leve a moderada. Os aspectos sociais apresentaram escore abaixo de 50 para os dois grupos. Houve diferenças entre os grupos em relação aos componentes do SF-36 e MRS para estado geral de saúde, capacidade funcional, menor capacidade, depressão, insônia e fenômenos vasomotores.


The experience of menopause is increasingly present, and demand strategies to improve the quality of life of women during this period. This research aimed to evaluate the quality of life for women in the climacteric phase, with or without the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). This is a longitudinal epidemiological study of a sample of 99 women per group. It was evaluated the sociodemographic, clinical and behavioral characteristics. It was used the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). For data analysis, it was used the Student t test, chi-square and Tukey. HRT users had an average age of 50.76 ± 3.63 years, and nonusers of 48.95 ± 6,27anos (p = 0.01). It was identified a higher frequency of moderate climacteric symptoms of mild intensity. The social aspects evidenced scores below 50 for the two groups. There were differences between groups with respect to the components of the SF-36 and MRS to general health, functional capacity, lower capacity, depression, insomnia and vasomotor phenomena.


La experiencia de la menopausia es cada vez más presente, demandando estrategias para mejorar la calidad de vida de las mujeres durante este periodo. Esa investigación tuvo como objetivo evaluar la calidad de vida de las mujeres en la fase climatérica, con o sin el uso de la terapia de reemplazo hormonal (TRH). Trata-se dé un estudio epidemiológico longitudinal, con una muestra de 99 mujeres por grupo. Fueran evaluadas las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y de comportamiento. Fueran aplicados a la muestra el Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) e el Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Utilizaran-se los testes t de Student, Qui-quadrado e Tukey. Las usuarias de TRH tenían una edad media de 50,76 ± 3,63 años, y las no usuarias de 48,95 ± 6,27anos (p = 0,01). Fue reportada una mayor frecuencia de síntomas climatéricos intensidad leve o moderada. Los aspectos sociales tuvieran puntuaciones por debajo de 50 para los dos grupos. Hubo diferencias entre los grupos con respecto a los componentes del SF-36 y el MRS para la salud en general, la capacidad funcional, la capacidad más baja, la depresión, el insomnio y los fenómenos vasomotores.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Floxuridine/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Infusions, Intravenous , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
11.
Indian J Cancer ; 2014 Apr-Jun; 51(2): 138-141
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-154315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the pathological complete response rates in a group of locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after treatment with induction folinic acid and 5‑florouracil (FOLFOX) chemotherapy and the relationship between the complete response and positron emission tomography‑computed tomography (PET‑CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The files of 239 patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer between January 2008 and January 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Of these, there were 24 locally advanced rectal cancer patients who met the following criteria: They were administered CRT after receiving four courses induction oxaliplatin, FOLFOX and they underwent PET‑CT for staging and for the evaluation of their response to FOLFOX treatment. Of these 24 patients, 20 operable patients were included in the study. RESULTS: The pathological complete response was obtained in seven patients (35%) who were operated on and then given induction four courses FOLFOX chemotherapy and CRT. We determined that age, gender, clinical stage at diagnosis and PET‑CT before and after induction chemotherapy were not predictive of the pathological complete response to tumor fluorodeoxyglucose uptake activity. CONCLUSION: The rates of pathological complete response were increased in locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent short‑term induction chemotherapy. Although the PET‑CT has retained its importance in predicting pathological complete response, there is still a need for studies with a larger number of patients and long‑term follow‑ups.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy , Female , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging , /therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Rev. chil. cir ; 65(3): 236-241, jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-684033

ABSTRACT

Background: preoperative chemo radiotherapy improves the prognosis of locally advanced low rectal cancer and induces a pathological response in the tumor, which may have prognostic value. Aim: to assess the results of rectal cancer treatment according to the degree of pathological response of the tumor after chemo radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: all patients with a locally advanced rectal cancer located within 11 cm of the rectal margin, subjected to preoperative chemo radiotherapy followed by surgical treatment in a period of 13 years, were included. Pathological response was classified as complete, intermediate and poor. The tumor was staged according to TNM 2002 classification. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: patients were followed for a mean of 50 months (range 18-156). Exclusive and global local relapse was observed in 3 and 9.6 percent of patients, respectively. Pathological response was complete in 13 patients (none died), intermediate in 23 (three died) and poor in 68 (22 died). Global five years survival was 74 percent. There was a concordance of 0.64 between survival and pathological response. The concordance between survival and TNM classification was 0.69. Conclusions: the pathological response of the tumor to chemo radiotherapy has a good concordance with prognosis, although it is not superior to the final pathological status.


Introducción: la radioquimioterapia (RQT) preoperatoria en el manejo del cáncer de recto bajo localmente avanzado mejora el control locoregional y es capaz de inducir en el tumor una respuesta patológica (RP) variable que podría tener implicancia pronóstica. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el grado de RP inducida por la RQT y comparar los resultados oncológicos de acuerdo al grado de RP luego de RQT neoadyuvante. Pacientes y Método: se incluyen todos los pacientes con un tumor de recto localmente avanzado por debajo de los 11 cm al margen anal sometidos a RQT seguida de cirugía radical con intención curativa en un período de 13 años. La RP fue categorizada como completa, intermedia y pobre. Para la etapificación patológica se utilizó la clasificación TNM 2002. Las curvas de sobrevida fueron estimadas según Kaplan-Meier, se empleó el modelo de regresión de Cox para el análisis multivariado y los coeficientes de concordancia fueron evaluados según el estadístico C de Harrell y el K de Gonen-Heller. Resultados: seguimiento promedio 50 meses (extremos 18-156). La recidiva local exclusiva fue 3 por ciento y la recidiva local global fue 9,6 por ciento. La RP fue completa en 13 pacientes (no fallecidos), Intermedia (ypT1-T2N0) en 23 (3 fallecidos) y fue pobre (ypT3/T4 y/o LN+) en 68 (22 fallecidos). Sobrevida global a 5 años 74 por ciento. Hubo una fuerte correlación entre la sobrevida y la RP, con un coeficiente de concordancia (0,64) ligeramente inferior al coeficiente de la etapificación patológica definitiva de acuerdo al TNM (0,69). Conclusión: el grado de RP es un marcador que se correlaciona bien con el pronóstico oncológico con un índice de concordancia de 0,69 cuando se asocia con la localización del tumor, aunque no supera al estadio patológico final que alcanza un valor de 0,74.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis
13.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 26(1): 31-35, jan.-mar. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-674138

ABSTRACT

RACIONAL: Tratamento neoadjuvante com radioterapia e quimioterapia é o esquema preferencial para câncer de reto localmente avançado, tendo por objetivo aumentar a ressecabilidade e diminuir a recidiva local. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os benefícios da operação tardia após radioterapia e quimioterapia neoadjuvante em câncer de reto localmente avançado quanto à resposta da regressão tumoral, sobrevida e efeitos adversos. MÉTODOS: Foram tratados consecutivamente 106 pacientes, portadores de adenocarcinoma do reto localmente avançado no período pré-operatório com radioterapia na dose de 50,4 Gy (28 frações) e quimioterapia com 5-fluoracil e leucovorin. A operação foi programada entre cinco e seis semanas. Pacientes que retornaram após seis semanas por motivos diversos foram agrupados em grupo de operação tardia. Variáveis como diminuição do estádio, remissão tumoral completa, tempo cirúrgico, transfusão sanguínea, recidiva local, metástase e sobrevida foram correlacionadas com o restante dos pacientes a fim de verificar os seus benefícios. RESULTADOS: Remissão completa do tumor foi encontrada em 15 pacientes (T0=15/106 - 14,2%). Resposta parcial em 38 (34,9%); entretanto em um paciente a resposta foi pT0N2. O seguimento médio foi 35,6 semanas e 32,2 semanas para grupo de operação em seis semanas e grupo de cirurgia tardia. Não houve diferença entre os dois grupos quanto à diminuição de estádio, remissão tumoral completa, tempo cirúrgico, transfusão sanguínea e complicações cirúrgicas precoces. Embora a operação tardia não apresentasse diferença significante quanto à recidiva local (p=0,1468), ela mostrou tendência em menor risco de metástase à distância (p=0,0520). CONCLUSÃO: Operação tardia após tratamento neoadjuvante não oferece benefícios evidentes em termos de remissão completa ou diminuição do estádio tumoral. Fatores moleculares preditivos devem ser investigados no futuro para melhor seleção de doentes que poderão beneficiar-se com o tratamento neoadjuvante.


BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the preferred regimen for locally advanced rectal cancer, aiming to increase resectability and decrease local recurrence. AIM: To evaluate the benefits of delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in advanced rectal cancer regarding aspects of tumor response, survival and its deleterious effects. METHODS: Were treated 106 patients consecutively with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with a dose of 50.4 Gy (28 fractions), 5-fluoracil and leucovorin was given. Surgery was scheduled within five to six weeks. Patients who returned later than six weeks for the scheduled surgery were grouped into the delayed group and variables such as the downstaging rate, complete response, surgical time, blood transfusion, local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival were correlated with the remaining patients in order to determine the benefits of the delayed surgery. RESULTS: Complete tumor response was found in 15 patients (T0=15/106 - 14.2%). Partial response was achieved in 38 patients (34.9%), while one patient had pT0N2 staging. The mean follow-up was 35.6 weeks for the six weeks group, and 32.2 weeks for the delayed group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of downstaging, complete tumor response, surgical time, blood transfusion and early post-operative complications. Although delayed surgery didn't have a significant difference regarding the local recurrence (p=0.1468), it showed a strong tendency in the delayed group of having a lower risk of distant metastasis (p=0.0520). CONCLUSION: Delayed surgery after chemoradiation offered no clear benefits in terms of complete tumor response or downstaging. Predictive molecular factors should be investigated in the future for the proper selection of patients who will benefit from chemoradiation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2013; 16 (1): 54-55
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-130536

ABSTRACT

Rectovaginal fistula [RVF] is one of the intractable complications following chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision [TME] for rectal cancer. It is supposed that there is a strong possibility of this complication occurring in patients after radiation therapy and having underlying sepsis. We describe herein two female patients [73 and 40 years old] who developed RVF after chemoradiation and TME for rectal cancer, who were successfully managed by gracilis muscle transposition. Fecal diversion was done as a preliminary step to the fistula repair. Success was defined as healed fistula after stoma closure. The strategy in the present report is a useful option for RVF management in such patients as other successful modalities are very limited


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Rectovaginal Fistula/surgery , Rectovaginal Fistula/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
15.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 22(4): 230-234, dic. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-694439

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El tratamiento actual del cáncer de recto combina muchas veces el uso de radio-quimioterapia preoperatoria y cirugía. Algunos autores postulan que la neoadyuvancia podría provocar mayor índice de complicaciones anastomóticas, especialmente en los tumores de recto inferior. Objetivo: Evaluar la incidencia de complicaciones anastomóticas en pacientes operados por tumor de recto inferior comparando aquellos que hayan recibido neoadyuvancia con los que no la recibieron. Como objetivo secundario se evalúo la mortalidad en ambos grupos. Lugar de aplicación: Hospital General de Agudos de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Diseño: Análisis comparativo retrospectivo. Población y métodos: Fueron evaluados 180 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de recto bajo. Sólo se seleccionaron para el análisis los tumores que fueron pasibles de resección rectal y anastomosis primaria y que estuvieran ubicados por debajo de los 12 cm. desde el margen anal en el período comprendido entre el año 2003 y 2010. Todos los pacientes fueron operados por el mismo equipo quirúrgico. Del total de 180 pacientes, 77 recibieron quimio-radioterapia preoperatoria (grupo 1), y 103 fueron operados sin tratamiento previo (grupo 2). Resultados: En el grupo 1 se registraron 5 complicaciones anastomóticas y hubo 2 casos de mortalidad, no asociada a complicación anastomótica. En el grupo 2 hubo 9 complicaciones anastomóticas y la mortalidad fue de cuatro casos, dos de ellos relacionados a dichas complicaciones. No hubo significación estadística para ninguna de estas diferencias (p=0.7797 y p=1.000 respectivamente) Conclusiones: La neoadyuvancia en cáncer de recto inferior no aumentó el número de complicaciones anastomóticas en esta serie.


Introduction: Current treatment of rectal cancer often combined the use of preoperative chemotherapy and radiosurgery. Some authors suggest that neoadjuvant therapy may result in higher rates of anastomotic complications, especially in lower rectal tumors. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of anastomotic complications in patients undergoing surgery for lower rectal tumor by comparing those who received neoadjuvant therapy with those who did not. A secondary objective was evaluated mortality in both groups. Application site: Acute General Hospital of the City of Buenos Aires. Design: Retrospective comparative analysis. Population and methods: 180 patients were evaluated with a diagnosis of low rectal cancer. Only selected for analysis the tumors were resecable rectal and primary anastomosis and were located below 12 cm. from the anal margin in the period between 2003 and 2010. All patients were operated by the same surgical team. Of the total 180 patients, 77 received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group 1), and 103 were operated without pretreatment (group 2). Results: In group l, there were 5 anastomotic complications and there were 2 cases of mortality, not associated with anastomotic complications. In group 2 there were 9 anastomotic complications and mortality was four cases, two of them related to these complications. There was no statistical significance for any of these differences (p = 0.7797 and p = 1.000 respectively) Conclusions: Neoadjuvant lower rectal cancer did not increase the number of anastomotic complications in this series.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical , Postoperative Complications , Preoperative Care , Treatment Outcome , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects
16.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 24(2): 113-120, abr.-jun. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-592478

ABSTRACT

RACIONAL: A excisão total do mesorreto é considerada a operação padrão no tratamento dos tumores do reto, apesar de não existir comprovação científica de que ela deva ser usada para todos os estádios da doença. Tem sido demonstrado que em casos escolhidos de tumores retais, resultados promissores podem ser conseguidos com tratamento local por microcirurgia endoscópica transanal. Tais tumores, denominados de câncer retal precoce, são tumores T1 - menores do que 4 cm -, bem diferenciados sem invasão angiolinfática pT1 Sm1. Como o risco de comprometimento linfonodal nesses tumores é de aproximadamente 3 por cento, a ressecção local teria grande chance de ser curativa. OBJETIVO: Apresentar os resultados de uma série prospectiva não randômica de pacientes portadores de câncer retal precoce submetidos ao tratamento local por microcirurgia endoscópica transanal. MÉTODOS: Entre 2002 e 2010, 38 pacientes avaliados por protocolo pré-operatório como portadores câncer retal precoce foram submetidos à ressecção local endoscópica microcirúrgica de toda a parede retal com o tumor quando localizado entre 2 e 8 cm da linha pectínea. A avaliação pré-operatória consistiu de toque retal, retossigmoidoscopia rígida para macrobiópsias, enema opaco e/ou colonoscopia, ultrassonografia endoretal e abdominal, tomografia axial computadorizada do abdome, radiografia do tórax e dosagem sérica do CEA. Realizou-se seguimento pós-operatório endoscópico e ultrassonográfico endoretal a cada três meses nos dois primeiros anos, e a cada seis nos próximos três anos, além de dosagem do CEA a cada seis meses nesse mesmo período de cinco anos. Avaliou-se a recidiva tumoral, morbidade e mortalidade. RESULTADOS: Após avaliação anatomopatológica da lesão, 29 cânceres retais precoces foram categorizados como de baixo risco e nove sendo de alto. O seguimento na série variou de um a sete anos. Recidiva tumoral foi confirmada em dois casos dos 38 (5,26 por cento), uma lesão considerada de alto...


BACKGROUND: The total mesorectal excision is considered the standard operation in the treatment of rectal tumors, although there is no scientific proof that it should be used for all stages of the disease. It has been demonstrated that in selected cases of rectal tumors, promising results can be achieved with local treatment by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. These tumors, called early rectal cancer, T1 tumors, are less than 4 cm, well differentiated without angiolymphatic invasion - pT1 SM1. As the risk of lymph node involvement in these tumors is approximately 3 percent, local resection would have a great chance to be curative. AIM: To present the results of a non-random prospective series of patients with early rectal cancer treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2010, 38 patients evaluated by preoperative protocol as patients with early rectal cancer underwent endoscopic microsurgical resection of the entire rectal wall including the tumor when located between 2 and 8 cm from the dentate line. The preoperative evaluation consisted of digital rectal examination, rigid sigmoidoscopy macrobiopsies, barium enema and/or colonoscopy, endorectal ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography of the abdomen, chest radiography and serum CEA. Was conducted follow-up with endoscopy and endorectal ultrasound every three months during the first two years, and every six in the next three years, and CEA every six months during the same period of five years. Was evaluated the tumor recurrence, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Pathologic evaluation considered 29 categorized as low risk and nine being high. The follow-up in the series ranged from one to seven years. Tumor recurrence was confirmed in two of the 38 cases (5.26 percent), in one the lesion was considered high and another low risk. CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery associated or not to adjuvant therapy, may be, currently, considered the gold standard in...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Early Diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Lymph Node Excision , Microsurgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
17.
Rev. argent. coloproctología ; 22(2): 73-79, jun. 2011. ilus, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-685113

ABSTRACT

Luego de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante un porcentaje de adenocarcinomas de recto bajo localmente avanzados presentarán remisión total de la lesión, a esto se lo conoce como Respuesta Clínica Completa; en estos casos la cirugía puede ser innecesaria. Nuestro grupo desde principios de los noventa ha incluído estos pacientes en un protocolo estricto de seguimiento que ha demostrado ser igual de seguro que el tratamiento convencional, sin las morbilidades de la cirugía radical. El presente reporte tiene por objeto definir lo que consideramos una Respuesta Clínica Completa, analizar sus implicancias y presentar nuestra experiencia en el manejo de este acontecimmiento.


After neoadjuvant chemoradiation, some patients with locally advanced low rectal adenocarcinoma will present with total tumor regression, this situation is known as Complete Clinical Response (CCR). In this setting immediate radical surgery could be unnecessary. Since the early nineties, our group has included this patients in a striet follow-up protocol, wich has proven to be oncologically equally safe as conventional treatment, without the morbidities of radical surgery. The objective of this report is to define what we consider a CCR and to present our experience in the management of this clinical situation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Drug Therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoembryonic Antigen , Diagnostic Imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
18.
Rev. chil. cir ; 62(6): 607-613, dic. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-577308

ABSTRACT

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is helpful as an adjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Aim: To report the results of a prospective series of patients with rectal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgical excision. Material and Methods: Seventy six patients aged 28 to 84 years (51 percent women), with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-T4 or N+) subjected to curative surgery and treated with radiotherapy and 5 fluoruracil with leucovorin, were included in this series. Results: Mean hospital stay was 12.5 +/- 7.2 days, 37 percent had operative complications and no patient died. The downstaging effect was more marked for local invasion than for lymph node involvement. In 21 percent of cases, a complete pathological response was achieved and no patient has had a relapse during a 59 months follow up. Conclusions: Among patients with rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not increase surgical complications and has a marked impact in tumor downstaging.


Antecedentes: El tratamiento del cáncer de recto bajo localmente avanzado ha cambiado en la última década hacia la neoadyuvancia con radio quimioterapia (RQT) preoperatoria. Objetivo: Dar a conocer los resultados de una serie prospectiva de casos tratados con RQT preoperatoria más cirugía radical con resección total del mesorrecto. Pacientes y Método: se incluye los pacientes con un cáncer de recto medio e inferior localmente avanzado (T3-T4 y/o N+) tratados con intención curativa con radioterapia más 5-FU con leucovorina. Se detalla el impacto de la RQT en la pieza operatoria comparado con una serie similar sin radioterapia previa. Resultados: Se trata de 76 pacientes (51,3 por ciento mujeres) con un promedio etario de 61,9 años (extremos 28-84). El tiempo de hospitalización promedio fue 12,55 días (DE: 7,19; extremos 4-35), la morbilidad global de la serie fue 37 por ciento, no hubo mortalidad operatoria. El efecto del downstaging fue más marcado en el factor T que en el compromiso linfonodal y en el 21 por ciento de los casos se logró una respuesta patológica completa (RPC) o casi completa (RP), sin recidiva en este subgrupo luego de un seguimiento promedio de 59 meses. Conclusión: En esta serie la RQT preoperatoria no aumenta la morbilidad perioperatoria, tiene un impacto marcado en el downstaging patológico y la RPC o RP casi completa se asocia positivamente con la sobrevida a largo plazo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Follow-Up Studies , Length of Stay , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
20.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2010; 20 (3): 175-180
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-93223

ABSTRACT

To determine the radiologic downstaging and histological response after neo-adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancers. Case series. Radiation Oncology department of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, from December 2004 to November 2005. Thirty patients with histopathologically confirmed locally advanced carcinoma rectum who had not received any treatment [chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery] prior to presentation were enrolled. Radiation therapy was delivered with a three-field technique to a dose of 50.4 Gy over 5 weeks at the rate of 1.8 Gy/day. Two cycles of chemotherapy were given synchronously, which comprised of 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m[2] and folinic acid 20 mg/m[2] continuous intravenous infusion over first five days and last five days of radiotherapy. Surgery was planned 4-6 weeks later to chemoradiation after radiologic post therapy staging. Viable specimens were identified and toxicity was observed. All patients completed treatment without modification. Radiologic downstaging was found in 56.7%, stable disease was seen in 30.0% and progressive disease was present in 13.3% of the patients. Radiologically complete resolution of tumour was not observed. Pathological complete resolution of tumour was achieved in 3.3% and near complete resolution was observed in 13.3% of the patients. In 86.6% cases, a total gross tumour resection with no macroscopic residual disease was possible. All the patients tolerated the treatment well. Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancers is associated with high resectability rate and is relatively safe with acceptable morbidity which favours its use in future


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL